Civilized Societies Don't Execute or Euthanize Human Beings

This article originally appeared in the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition Blog on February 7th, 2024 and is republished with permission of the author.

On January 25th, 2024, the State of Alabama legally executed one of its citizens, Kenneth Eugene Smith, with nitrogen gas. The Alabama Department of Corrections concocted this novel method to kill, apparently due to its botched previous attempt to kill Smith by lethal injection and the shortage of lethal barbiturates (the same poisons prescribed for assisted suicide). The parallels between killing by assisted suicide and killing death row inmates does not end there. If anything, our society's tolerance and embrace of legal lethal violence toward our fellow humans can best be described with one word: uncivilized.

Whether it is misplaced and disordered compassion toward the terminally ill or a perverted view of justice for a convicted murderer, destroying human life is simply not what civilized societies do. These are just two sides of the same barbaric coin.

I have previously made the argument regarding lethal injection and its connection to self-imposed euthanasia. When I learned what Smith would endure while dying by nitrogen gas, it turned my stomach just the same as when I first learned how uncivilized capital punishment is while I was participating in anti-euthanasia activism nearly two decades ago. 

In August of 2004, I was a 23-year-old graduate student from Texas returning to Tampa, Florida, solely to fight for Terri Schindler Schiavo to get a reprieve from execution by dehydration and starvation. I had been on her hospice’s lawn that prior September 2003 when Terri's Law passed through the Florida state house so then-Governor Jeb Bush would feel empowered to sign the executive order that restored her feeding tube (after it had been removed the second time). This executive order was a life-saving, emergency stopgap measure, rapidly winding its way through the courts, and was eventually vacated, leading to the third and final attempt on her life. We activists on Terri's behalf knew that we were on borrowed time, so we set out to unseat George Greer, the unrepentant elected judge who had repeatedly condemned Terri to an unfathomable, inhumane demise and would later sadly succeed. Since 2004 was an election year, I went to Tampa to campaign for Jan Govan, an attorney who had stepped up to challenge Greer specifically because Greer kept signing Terri’s unjust death warrant.

I don't recall how we got to the topic of capital punishment, but I do remember distinctly being surprised and perplexed at how Mr. Govan started talking about executions via the electric chair. Mr. Govan told me what happens during electrocution, that executioners must plug up the condemned person's orifices with gauze because otherwise, they will ooze. I immediately recoiled and said that that is no way for a civilized society to treat a human being. At the time I was fighting to spare Terri an unthinkable death, but so was the atrocity described to me. Although intravenous poisoning is largely considered a more humane alternative to electrocution, being killed by Pentobarbital is not as sanitized as it sounds and certainly not quick (one execution took two hours). What Kenneth Smith endured lasted over 15 minutes, but could easily be deemed far more macabre, not to mention dangerous for those administering the gas and anyone in proximity to it. Nitrogen hypoxia is so rife with complications and dangers that veterinarians rebuke this method to put household pets to sleep. Hypoxia itself is a euphemism for suffocation and nitrogen is a poor palatable option to smothering with a pillow or gripping one’s hands on someone’s neck. Rather than choke Smith, he would die from asphyxiation as nitrogen restricts oxygen intake. This caused him to writhe for two minutes and gasp for seven before the executioners closed the curtain to the viewing room.

I once made earnest arguments to highlight how cruel the removal of feeding tubes is by drawing a parallel between Terri's fate and convicted murderers on death row. This was prior to learning how unthinkable capital punishment is. Back then, I drew an arbitrary distinction between guilty people and innocent people, saying quips such as "Dehydration and starvation would be unconstitutional to execute a serial killer and yet fine for an innocent woman with a disability." I may have said such a thing and been overheard by Mr. Govan, although he acted as if he was speaking to someone anti-death penalty like himself. I soon was. It was an education on the inhumanity of capital punishment that struck me as something no civilized society could do to another human being, regardless of what crimes that human may have committed. I was there to protect one human from being killed and my eyes were opened to how unfathomable killing of any human being is. My deep concern for Terri was born of a heart that has always and will always ache at the thought of denying any human being food and water (or even denying this to an animal for that matter - any creature capable of enduring that pain). 

Experts and authorities at the United Nations called to cancel this execution and condemned this method as a form of torture. Reading about how Kenneth Smith would ultimately die struck the same part of my soul. The United States of America stands apart along with Japan as the only first-world nations that practice this crime against humanity. This puts our nation in the company of other human rights-abusing countries in the Middle East and Asia. Yet sadly, more and more developed countries are embracing euthanasia, ironically under the guise of poisoning as the humane alternative to a natural death.

Kenneth Smith’s last words were, “Tonight Alabama causes humanity to take a step backwards. I’m leaving with love, peace, and light." He was half right. He left thrashing and gasping, hardly a peaceful, loving demise. He was correct that humanity did regress into the inhumane. 

Each U.S. state that embraces assisted suicide also affronts and reverts our collective humanity. I hope beyond hope that this travesty opens others’ eyes as well and converts hearts on the death penalty like mine was, but likewise, I pray that it will inspire the same epiphany for those who oppose the death penalty yet support assisted suicide. 

It does not matter how we destroy a human life; it is always wrong. We must reject all forms of legal killing and take a step forward to reclaim our integrity, at least if we want to call ourselves civilized ever again.

Dr. Jacqueline Abernathy

Dr. Jacqueline Harvey Abernathy is a wife, mother, public sector consultant, and former graduate professor from San Antonio, Texas with decades of experience protecting life from womb to tomb.

Previous
Previous

Live and Let Live Is a False Hope

Next
Next

So You Want to Get Involved in Local Politics Part 2: Get Involved